Bonus Update Divine Bitches Gorgeous Big Tit Blonde Takes on Dweeby Male Mixed Wrestling
Hogtied - Inescapable Bondage and Brutal Orgasms

Comments made by timbre

Date Comment Site
Jun 29, 2006

A beautiful woman and good bondage model, but mediocre bondage at best, and as always, we see as much of the rigger as the model. A shame.

Water Bondage
Jun 29, 2006

Nude and spreadeagled in a hot tub---with huge, clunky heels? C'mon. That's taking the high heel fetish too far. Talk about adding inappropriate elements to an otherwise pleasing image...

Water Bondage
Jun 23, 2006

Overall, a sad waste of such a lovely girl.

Water Bondage
Jun 23, 2006

A lovely woman, but out of all of the photos in this set, there are only eight where the rigger, in whole or part, does not appear? Is this site all about him?

Water Bondage
Jun 11, 2006

OK, let's clarify. I'm not saying that a rigger should never be in a shoot, just that it should advance the "story line" so to speak, and that it should be the exception rather than the rule. The other major issue here is the nose clamp. Before the demise of Insex, it seemed that they couldn't do a shoot without a nose clamp. We have a lovely woman here with particularly beautiful breasts, and much of the photographic attention of this shoot seems to be on the nose clamp. Again, you want to use nose clamps, fine, but again, lets make them the exception rather than the rule.

Water Bondage
Jun 8, 2006

Overall, a sad waste of a beautiful woman. The bondage did not in any way accent her lovely figure or show off her beautiful breasts. Not one of your best works. You've even returned to poor camera work, such as cutting off the top of the model's head or other body parts. By all means, have her back, but not if this is all you can manage.

Water Bondage
Jun 8, 2006

And while I'm on a roll, a naked woman with pretty feet wearing huge, clunky shoes? Not esthetically pleasing. And, 29 photos in this series and the rigger is present in at least 19 in whole or in part? We pay for photos of the models, not the riggers.

Water Bondage
Jun 8, 2006

While Lew generally goes good work, I'm a bit tired of seeing him in the photos as much or more than the models. That's what you folks used to do with several riggers int hepast. You cleaned up your act for quite some time. Why are you reverting to such a poor practice. I'm not saying that riggers should never be in photos, but come on!

Water Bondage
Jun 4, 2006

I know this is asking a lot because this site is now apparently dedicated to showing the maximum number of photos of the rigger rather than the models, but can't you folks realize that we pay to see the models? We know the rigger gets to tie up and touch pretty naked women. We're all impressed. But we'd be more impressed if he would be a professional and, for the most part, get out of the photos.

Water Bondage
Jun 4, 2006

So, we have a model with a great figure, which you hide in red and black vinyl. And she has beautiful feet, so you must, of course, hide them in ridiculously clunky shoes that haven't seen the light of day since Disco. Tragic.

Water Bondage
Jun 4, 2006

Let's see. Forty-nine photos and only about 15 with only the model in them. What's wrong with this picture?

Water Bondage
Jun 3, 2006

What is it with you people and that extraordinarly ugly nose hook?

Water Bondage
Jun 3, 2006

Arggh! A truly stringent bondage, but absolutely no sense of camera angles! You folks continue to take fine models and squander your chances.

Water Bondage
Jun 3, 2006

A model with actual pubic hair? Incredible (but nice). However, once again, you suffer from your recurring problem with having the rigger in the photos as much as the model.

Water Bondage
Jun 3, 2006

Lovely girl. Silly and ineffective bondage.

Water Bondage