Comments made by brian01

For me, Nadia's a tough,jumping,jittering,hopping,bouncing, twirling, incredibly beautiful and sexy whirlwind of energy. I'm amazed.

For what it's worth, I, too, agree wholeheartedly with ramscrota's comments regarding the videography. It's not just this shoot, either. This coy camera-work regarding asses infects virtually all the Hogtied shoots, in my humble opinion. But what the heck, it's no use complaining, it's like flogging a dead horse! And anyway, the general quality of all the shoots is so brilliant that I can put-up with the frustration. There, I've got it off my chest and won't mention it ever again.

Having thought about it a bit more, I've come to the conclusion that as he is vastly experienced and professional the rigger must have been aware of the implications of denying orgasms - in which case he merely used it as a convenient "peg" on which to hang the shoot, in which case my vote becomes "Great". All this, of course, assumes my theory is right in the first place. 'bout time I shut up.

By definition it's part of BDSM, many viewers like it (which is fine by me), the rigger presumably doesn't dislike it and....the model likes it, but the brutality and treating the model like dirt doesn't do anything for me, it does NOT "turn me on". Perhaps I'm a hypocrite but, more probably, I'm just confused. There was an awful lot of this shoot that I positively disliked, and yet it fascinated me! - and there were some scenes that I found intensely erotic. The model, too, is incredibly beautiful and tough. (To whom it may concern, excuse my pomposity and please don't take anything I've said amiss. Please bear in mind that these are only my personal, subjective views, for what they are worth. I'm only trying to explain why I have voted the way I have. Generally, I find Hogtied brilliant. It's only the odd shoot here and there that makes me feel uncomfortablr and, as I say, doesn't turn me on).

Me again, regarding the stocking. I meant to say "....distorts the features.....". I'll shut-up now.

Expert rigger and gorgeous sexy model. The final scene was one of the most imaginatively erotic I have ever seen. I don't care a hoot if it's been done before. There's nothing new under the sun and if an idea is that good it deserves to be shown over and over again as far as I'm concerned. Would have loved to have voted this shoot "great" but my pet foible/hate cropped up yet again - for me, the camera is too often in the wrong place in so many of the Hogtied shoots. When something fundamental and "interesting" is being done to a model's ass, why does the cameraman only show it full-on for about 8 seconds before switching to yet another long shot of the model's face, ankles, chest or whatever. In fact, why is there this general, marked, coy tendency to not give full-on and "decent" length shots of the model's asses? Is the cameraman just trying to tease me or does he have some moral and/or religious scruples?! Somebody should tell him that this is a porn site and that good shots of asses are acceptable - nay, desirable! Sorry to go on about this but it really does irritate me. Oh, and another thing - most of this video seemed out of focues. I strongly suspect that it is not the fault of my computer or eyes.

I adore this beautiful, sexy, natural model with the infectious, lovable personality. Loved the introductory and final interviews, and was spellbound by the chair scene. The rigger was brilliant. Everybody is more than welcome to their opinion, of course, but I genuinely, honestly cannot understand how anybody can vote this shoot less than "Great".